[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071120055519.GD20436@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 06:55:19 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Chris Friedhoff <chris@...edhoff.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 STD with s2disk fails to activate suspended system
after loading - now 2.6.24-rc3
* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > increasing CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE from 7777 to 131072 hasn't
> > changed the non-functioning of 2.6.24-rc3
> >
> > s2disk works with 2.6.23.8 ; I tested 4 cycles in a row, 2 from
> > console and 2 from within X
>
> I've attached a patch to the bugzilla entry, please test it.
[...]
> --- linux-2.6.orig/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> +++ linux-2.6/init/do_mounts_initrd.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static void __init handle_initrd(void)
> sys_mount(".", "/", NULL, MS_MOVE, NULL);
> sys_chroot(".");
>
> + current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
> +
> pid = kernel_thread(do_linuxrc, "/linuxrc", SIGCHLD);
> if (pid > 0)
> while (pid != sys_wait4(-1, NULL, 0, NULL)) {
this is not the first time (and not the last time) that a missing
PF_NOFREEZE is causing hard to debug suspend problems. I think we should
be more robust about this and at minimum include some debug mechanism
that determines when a PF_NOFREEZE annotation is missing. (or at least
detect the condition somehow and report it) This bug took 10 days to
track down.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists