[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071119.234943.214163033.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:49:43 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: billfink@...dspring.com
Cc: kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, the.sator@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
From: Bill Fink <billfink@...dspring.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:16:07 -0500
> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
>
> > 2. What's about your suggestion, I thought about this and I am going to agree.
> >
> > Arguments, which convinced me are:
> >
> > - arping still works.
> > - any piece of reasonable software should work.
> > - if Windows understands DaD (is it really true? I cannot believe)
> > and it is unhappy about our responce and does not block use
> > of duplicate address only due to this, we _must_ accomodate ASAP.
> > - if we do,we have to use 0 protocol address, no choice.
>
> I agree the target protocol address should be 0 in this case.
Patches, someone :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists