[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711201345.39580.ak@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:45:39 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: "Metzger, Markus T" <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch][v2] x86, ptrace: support for branch trace store(BTS)
> - the internal buffer interpretation as well as the corresponding
> operations are selected at run-time by hardware detection
> - different processors use different branch record formats
I still think it would be far better if you would switch this over to be table
driven. e.g. define a record that contains offsetof()/sizeof() of the
different formats and use generic functions. That would decrease
code size considerably.
Also those manpages are really needed.
And your patch seems to be word wrapped.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists