[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071120080243.22725fb3@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:02:43 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:52:48 -0500
Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wro
>
> All of which reminds me of perhaps *the* most important reason to keep
> core functionality like "IRQ distribution" *inside* the kernel:
>
> It has to pass peer review on this mailing list.
that's a reason to keep it in the *source*, that's not the same as
keeping it in ring0 pinning down memory all the time etc ;)
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists