linux-kernel - Re: Is there any word about this bug in gcc ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071120184235.3bcfy3y2f4lc3s7i@m.safari.iki.fi>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:42:35 +0200
From:	Sami Farin <safari-kernel@...ari.iki.fi>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is there any word about this bug in gcc ?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 13:52:52 +0100, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Nov 20, 2007 7:52 AM, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:47:59PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > >
> > > This one is definitely messy.  There is absolutely no way to know what
> > > gcc has miscompiled.  It looks to me that both gcc 4.2 and 4.3 are
> > > affected, any others?
> >
> > I just tested it here and gcc 3.3 is also affected so presumably
> > everything in between is too.  Gcc 2.95 is not affected.  I don't
> > have the intervening versions to test.
> 
> Fedora 7's 4.1.2-27 is also affected.

-m32:
2.7.2.3: /tmp/cc1EO0wg.s:14: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
2.95.3: OK
3.0.4: broken
3.1.1: broken
3.2.3: broken
3.3.5: broken
3.4.6: broken
4.0.3: broken

-m32 and -m64:
gcc Red Hat 4.1.2-33: broken
4.2.2 20070909 (prerelease): broken

-- 
Do what you love because life is too short for anything else.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/