[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071120105458.GA1597@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:54:58 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: nohz and strange sleep latencies
Hi!
>
> > > > 0.00user 0.00system 0.08 (0m0.081s) elapsed 3.71%CPU
> > > > 0.00user 0.00system 0.01 (0m0.013s) elapsed 23.33%CPU
> > > > 0.00user 0.00system 0.01 (0m0.019s) elapsed 15.92%CPU
> > > >
> > > > nohz=off helps a lot. while true; do time sleep 0.0; done does not
> > > > have unexpected latencies.
> > >
> > > does hpet=disable on the boot line also help? (without nohz=off)
> >
> > hpet-disable helps.. a bit. 200msec latencies are gone. (What is used
> > for wakeups in this case?)
> >
> > pavel@amd:~$ while true; do time sleep 0.01; done
> > 0.00user 0.00system 0.01 (0m0.013s) elapsed 22.96%CPU
> > 0.00user 0.00system 0.01 (0m0.018s) elapsed 11.05%CPU
> > 0.00user 0.00system 0.01 (0m0.013s) elapsed 15.54%CPU
>
> could you run this while doing the sleep test:
>
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/cfs-debug-info.sh
>
> and send us the output? (Enabling CONFIG_TIMER_STATS, CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG
> and CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS would maximize the amount of information.)
This was w/o hpet=disable . Do you want me to test with hpet=disable?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "cfs-debug-info-2007.11.20-11.51.22.gz" of type "application/octet-stream" (44037 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists