[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711201246500.26745@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:48:26 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
cc: ak@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, travis@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc 44/45] Remove local_t support
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> The question that arises is : are there some architectures that do not
> provide fast PER_CPU ops but provides fast local atomic ops ?
There were only a few no critical users of local_t before this patch. So I
doubt that it matters.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists