linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071120212647.GA18867@csn.ul.ie>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:26:48 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Lee.Schermerhorn@...com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, nacc@...ibm.com,
	kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask

On (20/11/07 12:18), Christoph Lameter didst pronounce:
> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Mel Gorman wrote:
> 
> > Went back and revisited this. Allocating them at boot-time is below but
> > essentially it is a silly and it makes sense to just have two zonelists
> > where one of them is for __GFP_THISNODE. Implementation wise, this involves
> > dropping the last patch in the set and the overall result is still a reduction
> > in the number of zonelists.
> 
> Allright with me. Andrew could we get this patchset merged?
> 

They will not merge cleanly with a recent tree. I expect to be ready to
post a new set when regression tests complete later this evening.

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/