[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071120135839.08837372@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:58:39 -0800
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:02:43 -0500
Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
> ..
>
> Well, for my dualCore notebook, dualCore MythTV box, and QuadCore
> desktop, the behaviour of the existing, working, 32-bit kernel
> IRQBALANCE code outperforms the userspace utility.
>
> Mostly, I suspect, due to it's much faster response to changing
> conditions. That's something the external one could try to match, but
> at present it seems tuned specifically for high-traffic network
> servers, not for the average notebook or desktop.
I'd really like to see what it's doing before commenting on this;
at minimum can you give me the /proc/interrupts of the system?
It might a simple bug or simple missing item, not a total "scratch the
full system".
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@...ux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists