linux-kernel - Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071120234725.GH23667@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:47:25 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?


* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:

> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> * Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps, but this also violates the principle that the kernel should just 
>>> *work* with sensible defaults.  I don't use an initrd, or an initramfs, 
>>> and have no intention of ever doing so.
>>
>> nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work out of a 
>> bzImage too? Am i wrong?
>>
>
> Nope.  It runs inside an initramfs, of course; that initramfs is 
> linked into the kernel binary.

would be nice to have a single-image variant for all of this. having the 
separate initrd was always trouble - and it's pointless as well. (we 
rarely update the initrd without updating the vmlinuz as well)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/