[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47422AA3.7060507@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:30:27 -0500
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, David <david@...olicited.net>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, gregkh@...e.de,
Javier Kohen <jkohen@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] Soft lockups since stable kernel upgrade to 2.6.23.8
On 11/17/2007 07:55 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
>
>> Great, thanks for tracking this down.
>>
>> Ingo, this corrisponds to changeset
>> a115d5caca1a2905ba7a32b408a6042b20179aaa in mainline. Is that patch
>> incorrect? Should this patch in the -stable tree be reverted?
>
> hm, there are no such problems in .24 and the cpu_clock() and other
> fixes i did were not picked up. Find the missing fixes below. They
> should work just fine in .23 as it has the cpu_clock() functionality
> too.
>
> [ NOTE: the most robust thing is to make the .23 version match the .24
> version of kernel/softlockup.c, so i included two other harmless
> changes in this diff as well. ]
>
> Ingo
>
> ----------->
> commit a5f2ce3c6024a5bb895647b6bd88ecae5001020a
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Tue Oct 16 23:26:08 2007 -0700
>
> commit 43581a10075492445f65234384210492ff333eba
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Date: Tue Oct 16 23:26:08 2007 -0700
Those are just cosmetic / cleanup changes.
Don't you need commit a3b13c23f186ecb57204580cc1f2dbe9c284953a ??
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists