[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711211615.14829.oliver@neukum.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:15:14 +0100
From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To: "Markus Rechberger" <mrechberger@...il.com>
Cc: "Mark Lord" <lkml@....ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurentp@...-semaphore.com>
Subject: Re: USB deadlock after resume
Am Mittwoch 21 November 2007 schrieb Markus Rechberger:
> > Which URB is usb_kill_urb() called for?
> >
>
> it's the usb_control_message which calls usb_kill_urb if I haven't got
> it wrong. (if you're looking for some other information please let me
> know)
> Although, I got a bit further with it. The error seems to happen
> earlier already.
> If I load the driver, and do not access the device after suspending
> all usb_control commands fail with -71 eproto.
A timeout. You should add the RESET_RESUME quirk for your device.
usb_reset_device() from resume() is not a good idea.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists