[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711210201.16331.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:01:15 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net
On Wednesday, 21 of November 2007, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > can you see any danger to providing a /proc/self_task/ link? (or can you
> > think of a better name/API/approach)
>
> That is a poor name to choose given /proc/self/task exists as something
> else (just try writing a sentence comparing them and then read it aloud).
> Probably /proc/self/task/self is what makes the most sense structurally.
> I don't know if it matters to whatever use you are concerned with to have
> two more steps in the lookup.
Hm, /proc/this_thread maybe?
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists