linux-kernel - Re: Problem with ufs nextstep in 2.6.18 (debian)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:37:55 +0100
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Dave Bailey <dsbailey@...bell.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>
Subject: Re: Problem with ufs nextstep in 2.6.18 (debian)

> This problem has been around since kernel 2.6.16, and I see it in
> 2.6.23.1-10.fc7. It occurs in the ufs_check_page function of ufs/dir.c
> at the Espan test, which seems unnecessary for NextStep/OpenStep
> files systems. The following patch preserves the test for other file
> systems and makes the mount useful for NextStep/OpenStep:
> (against the 2.6.23.1-10.fc7 source tree)
> 
> dsb@...o-Dyn[1012]$ diff dir.c dir.c.orig
> 108,110d107
> <       unsigned mnext = UFS_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt &
> <         (UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_NEXTSTEP || UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_NEXTSTEP_CD ||
> <          UFS_MOUNT_UFSTYPE_OPENSTEP);
> 131c128
> <               if ((mnext == 0) & (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & 
> ~chunk_mask))
> ---
> >               if (((offs + rec_len - 1) ^ offs) & ~chunk_mask)
  Thanks for your contribution but we cannot take it as is - at least
Signed-off-by line is missing and the patch should also be in unified
diff format. Please read linux/Documentation/SubmittingPatches...
Thanks.

							Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SuSE CR Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/