[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1195604010.6352.237.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:13:30 -0800
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/18] x86 vDSO: consolidate vdso32
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 14:06 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This makes x86_64's ia32 emulation support share the sources used in the
> 32-bit kernel for the 32-bit vDSO and much of its setup code.
>
> The 32-bit vDSO mapping now behaves the same on x86_64 as on native 32-bit.
> The abi.syscall32 sysctl on x86_64 now takes the same values that
> vm.vdso_enabled takes on the 32-bit kernel. That is, 1 means a randomized
> vDSO location, 2 means the fixed old address. The CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO
> option is now available to make this the default setting, the same meaning
> it has for the 32-bit kernel. (This does not affect the 64-bit vDSO.)
I think you should drop CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO support for 32-bit VDSO on
64-bit kernel. This was only to hack around a broken version of glibc
that shipped with SUSE PRO 9.0, which had broken assertions based on
misinterpretation of ELF fields. 64-bit machines will never see this
glibc and the hack can die.
Perhaps it is finally time to remove the hack from 32-bit as well, and
eliminate COMPAT_VDSO entirely? Or does it really have to live forever.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists