[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1pry4pe6z.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:41:56 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3: find complains about /proc/net
Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca> writes:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Could you elaborate a bit on how the semantics of returning the
>> wrong information are more useful?
>>
>> In particular if a thread does the logical equivalent of:
>> grep Pid: /proc/self/status. It always get the tgid despite
>> having a different process id.
>
> The POSIX-defined userspace concept of a PID requires that all threads appear to
> have the same PID. This is something that Linux didn't comply with under the old
> LinuxThreads implementation and was finally fixed with NPTL. This isn't a
> POSIX-defined interface, but I assume it's trying to be consistent with
> getpid(), etc.
Linux exports two fields in /proc/self/status:
Tgid: 32698
Pid: 32698
The tgid maps to the posix concept. The pid is this context is the
thread id.
So it seems broken to me to return the same thread id for different threads.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists