[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1195617255.2329.78.camel@wirenth>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:54:15 +0000
From: ian <spyro@....com>
To: eric miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
ARM Linux <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] 0/4 Support for Toshiba TMIO multifunction devices
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 10:23 +0800, eric miao wrote:
> Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-)
>
> 1. is it possible to use some name other than "soc_core", maybe
> "tmio_core" so that other multifunction chips sharing a core base
> will live easier.
It's (soc-core) not tmio MFD specific - its already used by other MFD
chips (although obviously not ones in mainline (yet!)
it might be better named 'mfd-core' though, as thats its intended use...
> 2. those C++ style comments "//" are not so pleasant...
Should I clean them up and resubmit?
More to the point, who should I be submitting them to? the files under
arm/ are obviously for RMK to peruse, but I couldnt find an entry for
drivers/mfd in MAINTAINERS...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists