linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:56:22 +1100
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

On Thursday 22 November 2007 13:43:06 Andi Kleen wrote:
> There seems to be rough consensus that the kernel currently has too many
> exported symbols. A lot of these exports are generally usable utility
> functions or important driver interfaces; but another large part are
> functions intended by only one or two very specific modules for a very
> specific purpose.

Hi Andi,

    This is an interesting idea, thanks for the code!  My only question is 
whether we can get most of this benefit by dropping the indirection of 
namespaces and have something like "EXPORT_SYMBOL_TO(sym, modname)"?  It
doesn't work so well for exporting to a group of modules, but that seems
a reasonable line to draw anyway.

Cheers,
Rusty.
PS.  Probably better to use the standard warnx and errx in modpost, too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/