linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] Clean up open coded inode dirty checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071123180239.GA13229@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:02:39 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
Cc:	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Clean up open coded inode dirty checks

> +STATIC_INLINE int xfs_inode_clean(xfs_inode_t *ip)
> +{
> +	return (((ip->i_itemp == NULL) ||
> +		!(ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields & XFS_ILOG_ALL)) &&
> +		(ip->i_update_core == 0));
> +}

Can we please get rid of this useless STATIC_INLINE junk?  It's really
hurting my eyes.  As does to a lesser extent the verbose style of this
function.  This should be something like:

static inline int xfs_inode_clean(struct xfs_inode *ip)
{
	return (!ip->i_itemp ||
	        !(ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields & XFS_ILOG_ALL)) &&
	       !ip->i_update_core;
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/