[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071123185101.GA17582@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:51:02 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23 WARNING: at kernel/softirq.c:139 local_bh_enable()
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:48:51PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@....mipt.ru) wrote:
> Stop, we are trying to free skb without destructor and catch connection
> tracking, so it is not a solution. To fix the problem we need to check
> if it is not netfilter related, kind of this (not tested), Simon please
> give it a try:
And to be really cool we need to bypass skbs with xfrm attached, since
its freeing also assumes BH context.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
diff --git a/net/core/netpoll.c b/net/core/netpoll.c
index 758dafe..5f86e60 100644
--- a/net/core/netpoll.c
+++ b/net/core/netpoll.c
@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static void zap_completion_queue(void)
while (clist != NULL) {
struct sk_buff *skb = clist;
clist = clist->next;
- if (skb->destructor)
+ if (skb->destructor || skb->nfct ||
+ skb->nfct_reasm || skb->sp)
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb); /* put this one back */
else
__kfree_skb(skb);
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists