linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 9/9] Clean up open coded inode dirty checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195847251.4930.21.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:47:31 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, David Chinner <dgc@....com>,
	xfs-oss <xfs@....sgi.com>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] Clean up open coded inode dirty checks

On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 19:16 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> static inline bool xfs_inode_clean(const struct xfs_inode *ip)
> {
> 	if (ip->i_itemp == NULL)
> 		return true;
> 	if (!(ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields & XFS_ILOG_ALL) &&
> 	    ip->i_update_core == NULL)
> 		return true;
> 	return false;
> }

Your code changed the test.
xfs_inode.i_update_core is an unsigned char.

I believe reordering the tests to avoid a possibly
unnecessary dereference is better.

	if (ip->i_update_core)
		return false;
	if (!ip->i_itemp)
		return true;
	return ip->i_itemp->ili_format.ilf_fields & XFS_ILOG_ALL;


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/