[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071122234141.087743fa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:41:41 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] Export force_sig_info
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:36:52 +1100 Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org> wrote:
> This change allows force_sig_info to be called from modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>
>
> --
>
> Any objections to exporting this symbol? I'm planning to move some
> SPU fault-handling code from the kernel to the spufs.ko object.
>
> ---
>
> kernel/signal.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Index: linux-2.6-spufs/kernel/signal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-spufs.orig/kernel/signal.c
> +++ linux-2.6-spufs/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ force_sig_info(int sig, struct siginfo *
>
> return ret;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(force_sig_info);
>
> void
> force_sig_specific(int sig, struct task_struct *t)
Perhaps export it from within a powerpc-specific C file (along with
suitable comment) to prevent people from generally relying upon the export?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists