lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:16:43 +0900
From:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To:	Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
CC:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: don't use legacy DMA in ADMA mode (v2)

Robert Hancock wrote:
> We need to run any DMA command with result taskfile requested in ADMA mode
> when the port is in ADMA mode, otherwise it may try to use the legacy DMA engine
> in ADMA mode which is not allowed. Enforce this with BUG_ON() since data
> corruption could potentially result if this happened. Also WARN_ON() if we try
> and send result taskfile commands while NCQ commands are still active, since the
> hardware doesn't allow this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
> 
> @@ -1425,9 +1427,17 @@
> +	/* We can't handle result taskfile with NCQ commands active, since
> +	   retrieving the taskfile switches us out of ADMA mode and would abort
> +	   existing commands. */
> +	WARN_ON((qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF) &&
> +		(qc->ap->qc_allocated & ~(1 << qc->tag)));

I owe an apology here.  ap->qc_allocated & ~(1 << qc->tag) test isn't
correct.  Sorry.  qc deferring happens after qc is allocated so the
condition can trigger (although it should be rare) even when nothing is
going wrong, so I guess it should be WARN_ON((qc->flags &
ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF) && link->sactive).

Sorry. :-)

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ