[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4747B3BB.4000708@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:16:43 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ide <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sata_nv: don't use legacy DMA in ADMA mode (v2)
Robert Hancock wrote:
> We need to run any DMA command with result taskfile requested in ADMA mode
> when the port is in ADMA mode, otherwise it may try to use the legacy DMA engine
> in ADMA mode which is not allowed. Enforce this with BUG_ON() since data
> corruption could potentially result if this happened. Also WARN_ON() if we try
> and send result taskfile commands while NCQ commands are still active, since the
> hardware doesn't allow this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Hancock <hancockr@...w.ca>
>
> @@ -1425,9 +1427,17 @@
> + /* We can't handle result taskfile with NCQ commands active, since
> + retrieving the taskfile switches us out of ADMA mode and would abort
> + existing commands. */
> + WARN_ON((qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF) &&
> + (qc->ap->qc_allocated & ~(1 << qc->tag)));
I owe an apology here. ap->qc_allocated & ~(1 << qc->tag) test isn't
correct. Sorry. qc deferring happens after qc is allocated so the
condition can trigger (although it should be rare) even when nothing is
going wrong, so I guess it should be WARN_ON((qc->flags &
ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF) && link->sactive).
Sorry. :-)
--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists