[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1195886608.25590.59.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:43:28 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...log.com>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [MTD/NAND]: Add Blackfin BF52x on-chip NAND Flash
controller driver support in bf5xx_nand driver
On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 17:04 -0500, Robin Getz wrote:
> It could be a runtime if() but we don't currently have the is_mach() all set
> up properly today.
>
> This is because on most systems that Blackfin ships on - memory is the
> dominate cost of the system, and end users don't want to take the either the
> storage (flash) hit of having code they don't use, or the run time (DRAM)
> overhead. They are fine with compiling 2 kernels for two platforms if it
> means things are cheaper. :)
>
> That being said, we still need to go back, and add things properly - and just
> let gcc optimise things away if it is not used - c code is more maintainable
> than all the ifdefs we have today.
>
> This is the goal - it will just take a little bit to get there.
For now I suspect you could at least define machine_is_bf52x() and
machine_is_bf54x() which are hard-coded to either zero or one according
to the configuration, and at least you wouldn't need to add ifdefs to
drivers.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists