[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4747D610.6040108@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:43:12 -0800
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 4/5] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 1) Can the fd passing with recvmsg() on AF_UNIX also gets O_CLOEXEC
> support ?
Already there, see MSG_CMSG_CLOEXEC.
> 2) Why this O_NONBLOCK ability is needed for sockets ? Is it a security
> issue, and if yes could you remind it to me ?
No security issue. But look at any correct network program, all need to
set the mode to non-blocking. Adding this support to the syscall comes
at almost no cost and it cuts the cost for every program down by one or
two syscalls.
- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHR9YQ2ijCOnn/RHQRArbyAJ0d25FPg/BWmJ4YIzJKhO9iaBJNXwCgmpuX
PAA6u3Dc56AlBegTRqtqJPc=
=j5vi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists