linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sdio_uart: fix sign of paramter status in sdio_uart_receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <alpine.LFD.0.99999.0711241029010.9605@xanadu.home>
Date:	Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:35:44 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>
To:	Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
Cc:	Andre Haupt <andre@...wigglers.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Andre Haupt <andre@...wigglers.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sdio_uart: fix sign of paramter status in
 sdio_uart_receive_chars()

On Sat, 24 Nov 2007, Pierre Ossman wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:33:45 +0100
> Andre Haupt <andre@...wigglers.org> wrote:
> 
> > I think, the status paramter should be unsigned. Is this correct?
> > This also fixes a sparse warning about different signedness.
> > Only compile tested, because i do not have the hardware.
> > 
> > From: Andre Haupt <andre@...wigglers.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Andre Haupt <andre@...wigglers.org>
> 
> Nicolas, does this seem correct to you? I'm not familiar with the 
> serial stuff.

Yes, that should be fine.

Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@....org>


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/