lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:23:52 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:01:09PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> This makes ptrace_request handle all the ptrace requests that wake
> up the traced task.  These do low-level ptrace implementation magic
> that is not arch-specific and should be kept out of arch code.  The
> implementations on each arch usually do the same thing.  The new
> generic code makes use of the arch_has_single_step macro and generic
> entry points to handle PTRACE_SINGLESTEP.

Nice, I've been trying to get people to move this to common code for
a while :)


> +#ifdef PTRACE_SINGLESTEP
> +#define is_singlestep(request)		((request) == PTRACE_SINGLESTEP)
> +#else
> +#define is_singlestep(request)		0
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef PTRACE_SYSEMU
> +#define is_sysemu_singlestep(request)	((request) == PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP)
> +#else
> +#define is_sysemu_singlestep(request)	0
> +#endif

Could we by any chance just force every architecture using generic code
to implement PTRACE_SINGLESTEP and PTRACE_SYSEMU?  This will lead to
both far less messy code and a more consistant user interface.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ