[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071125164532.GB6658@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:45:32 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular
On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 05:21:07PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 25 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > There isn't any big advantage and doesn't seem to be much usage of
> > > modular schedulers.
> > >
> > > OTOH, the overhead made the kernel image of an x86 defconfig (that
> > > doesn't use modular schedulers) bigger by nearly 2 kB.
> >
> > Big nack, I use it all the time for testing.
>
> OK.
>
> > Just because you don't
> > happen to use it is not a reason to remove it.
>
> s/you/you and all distributions you checked/
Well they should make them modules (two of them, that is). It's been a
long time since I considered a distro .config a benchmark/guideline of
any sort.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists