[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0711261007370.22202@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:08:21 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
To: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
> > on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
> > fail thusly:
> >
> > rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.6.24rc3g2ffbb837dirty.tar.gz
> > --target: unknown option
> >
> > so it would make more sense to just require "rpmbuild" on the
> > machine, would it not?
>
> Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
> systems that don't have rpmbuild installed. So the change wouldn't
> fix anything, and would break some non-zero number of setups that
> are currently working, making the change a guaranteed net loss.
>
> A patch that added version checks against rpm and whinged
> appropriately about needing rpmbuild would likely be accepted,
> though.
yes, i suspect that's the right answer.
rday
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists