linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071126122706.GA5167@ucw.cz>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:27:07 +0000
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

On Sun 2007-11-25 17:16:31, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch removes the EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on 
> EXPERIMENTAL because they are pointless.
> 
> Complete rationale:
> - Many people and all distributions are currently forced to enable
>   CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL since the options for many device drivers depend
>   on this option.
>   I have yet to see someone not being able to install his favorite
>   distribution on his computer only because the distribution did choose
>   to disable all SATA drivers with dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL in their
>   kernels...
> - History has shown that often the dependency on EXPERIMENTAL is not
>   removed when the code has proven usable.
>   As an example, is our NFSv4 support really still in an
>   "alpha-test phase" [1], or is it already ready for being used?
>   I don't know the answer in this specific case, but I wouldn't answer
>   "still in an alpha-test phase" only based on the fact that the NFSv4
>   options still depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
> - It might have been differently 10 years ago, but today everything that
>   is available in a released kernel should also be in a usable state.
> 
> [1] quoted from the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL help text

I don't think this is good idea. But perhaps 'experimental' should be
removed from stuff that is really stable these days, like SATA?

							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/