linux-kernel - Re: Clarification re: outstanding IPC flaws

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <671c20540711260905p11249695x9e3999bf25f3cf2@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:05:31 -0500
From:	"Tom Burns" <tom.i.burns@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Clarification re: outstanding IPC flaws

Sorry for the double post.

On Nov 26, 2007 12:01 PM, Tom Burns <tom.i.burns@...il.com> wrote:
> I have some questions about this comment.
>
> Most importantly - does this mean that if I have multiple processes
> queued inside semop() calls with sem_val = -1 (also, if it matters,
> SEM_UNDO flag is set),

This should read "sem_op = -1" as opposed to "sem_val = -1".

Cheers,
Tom Burns
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/