linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] fix setsid() for sub-namespace /sbin/init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071126201139.GA84@tv-sign.ru>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:11:39 +0300
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fix setsid() for sub-namespace /sbin/init

On 11/26, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru> writes:
> 
> > sys_setsid() still deals with pid_t's from the global namespace. This means
> > that the "session > 1" check can't help for sub-namespace init, setsid() can't
> > succeed because copy_process(CLONE_NEWPID) populates PIDTYPE_PGID/SID links.
> 
> We can do even better.  We can remove the misguided code from
> copy_process(CLONE_NEWPID) that populates the PIDTYPE_PGID/SID links
> and generally does set setsid by hand,

Yes you are right. IIRC there was a patch from you, but I didn't follow the
discussion, sorry, so I don't know what was the verdict.

If we remove that "almost setsid" from copy_process(), we can remove the fat
comment and the "session != 1" chunk from setsid().

> and the code from kernel_init
> that call set_special_pid(), allowing us to remove the special case
> entirely.

This is different, perhaps we can keep this call. kernel_thread(kernel_init)
attaches /sbin/init to init_struct_pid. Nothing bad, and a "good" init should
do setsid() anyway. But who knows? Some special environment may expect that
getpgrp() != 0. Not that I really disagree on this issue though.

Oleg.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/