[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071125233949.f64b2ecd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 23:39:49 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Subject: Re: enable dual rng on VIA C7
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:49:08 +0100 Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@...all.nl> wrote:
> Any reason why the second rng on the VIA C7 CPU is not enabled?
>
> Kind regards,
> Udo
>
>
> [via-rng.patch text/plain (634B)]
> --- old/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c 2007-11-11 19:39:49.000000000 +0100
> +++ new/drivers/char/hw_random/via-rng.c 2007-11-11 19:40:41.000000000 +0100
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> VIA_STRFILT_ENABLE = (1 << 14),
> VIA_RAWBITS_ENABLE = (1 << 13),
> VIA_RNG_ENABLE = (1 << 6),
> + VIA_RNG_DUAL = (1 << 9),
> VIA_XSTORE_CNT_MASK = 0x0F,
>
> VIA_RNG_CHUNK_8 = 0x00, /* 64 rand bits, 64 stored bits */
> @@ -128,6 +129,7 @@
> lo &= ~(0x7f << VIA_STRFILT_CNT_SHIFT);
> lo &= ~VIA_XSTORE_CNT_MASK;
> lo &= ~(VIA_STRFILT_ENABLE | VIA_STRFILT_FAIL | VIA_RAWBITS_ENABLE);
> + lo |= VIA_RNG_DUAL;
> lo |= VIA_RNG_ENABLE;
>
> if (lo != old_lo)
>
Does the patch work?
It's missing a signed-off-by:, btw
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists