[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F81BD9A7-9D76-4C2C-AF80-AAA3F70F061E@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:41:55 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 11/14] Powerpc: Use generic per cpu
On Nov 26, 2007, at 6:14 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Powerpc has a way to determine the address of the per cpu area of the
> currently executing processor via the paca and the array of per cpu
> offsets is avoided by looking up the per cpu area from the remote
> paca's (copying x86_64).
>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
>
> ---
> include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h | 19 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 19 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h 2007-11-24
> 10:27:31.088350556 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6/include/asm-powerpc/percpu.h 2007-11-24
> 10:29:20.752350757 -0800
> @@ -16,25 +16,6 @@
> #define __my_cpu_offset() get_paca()->data_offset
> #define per_cpu_offset(x) (__per_cpu_offset(x))
This concerns me. paca doesn't exist on all PPC platforms.
- k
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists