| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:53:29 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:55:07 -0800 (PST) Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote: > This defines the new macro arch_has_single_step() in linux/ptrace.h, a > default for when asm/ptrace.h does not define it. It declares the new > user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions. > This is not used yet, but paves the way to harmonize on this interface > for the arch-specific calls on all machines. I think I'll duck this lot for now in view of the (relatively small) amount of followup. I did do an experimental will-it-apply and got a tremendous number of rejects against the x86 git tree, almost all of which went away when `patch -l' was used. Seems that someone has gone on a whitespace rampage through arch/x86/ia32/ptrace32.c and arch/x86/ia32/ptrace64.c. That's kinda/sorta OK, but `patch -l' is a bit more inclined to misplace hunks and it's all a bit risky. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists