| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20071127021418.8a05d225.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:14:18 -0800 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: bonding sysfs output On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:56:43 +0100 Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu> wrote: > > - raise patches against the latest Linus tree > > (ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/) > > I thought it was better to change to git. Isn't it so? Yes, git is a bit more uptodate than the snapshots. But if that matters you were very unlucky. > SubmittingPatches has nothing to say about that... > Can I find collected best practices somewhere? Which tree, which > branch, how/when to rebase, format-patch, etc... gosh. Documentation/Submit*, http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt, http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html, other places. Probably people have written books about it by now. But don't sweat it - you're close enough ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists