[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071127111707.GA18727@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:17:07 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
* Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> If echo "1">/proc/sys/kernel/sched_compat_yield before starting
> volanoMark testing, the result is very good with kernel 2.6.24-rc3 on
> my 16-core tigerton.
yep, that's known and has been discussed in detail on lkml. Java should
use something more suitable than sched_yield for its locking. Yield will
always be dependent on scheduling details and _some_ category of apps
will always hurt. That's why we offer the sched_compat_yield flag.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists