linux-kernel - Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:17:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield


* Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> If echo "1">/proc/sys/kernel/sched_compat_yield before starting 
> volanoMark testing, the result is very good with kernel 2.6.24-rc3 on 
> my 16-core tigerton.

yep, that's known and has been discussed in detail on lkml. Java should 
use something more suitable than sched_yield for its locking. Yield will 
always be dependent on scheduling details and _some_ category of apps 
will always hurt. That's why we offer the sched_compat_yield flag.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/