| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 18:40:24 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> Cc: David Chinner <dgc@....com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, xfs-masters@....sgi.com, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: freeze vs freezer On Tuesday, 27 of November 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:53:34PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > > So how do you handle threads that are blocked on I/O or a lock during > > > the system freeze process, then? > > > > We wait until they can continue. > > So if I have a process blocked on an unavilable NFS mount, I can't > suspend? That's correct, you can't. [And I know what you're going to say. ;-)] Greetings, Rafael - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists