lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d15adc960711271238g73fcf3bdv8f67cbcd54382991@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:38:04 -0800
From:	"Saswat Praharaj" <saswat@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	saswat@...il.com
Subject: Question on splice

Hello All,

I am a linux application programmer and kernel newbie.

I would like to use splice() / tee() to do some packet forwarding.
I think these two systems calls are there in 2.6.18 kernel.

My company is deciding to use either 2.6.21 or 2.6.22 kernel in our product.

My question is : Is splice() stable in 2.6.21 / 2.6.22 ?

I found this link where it says

 http://lwn.net/Articles/251707/ (search splice)

Jens Axboe (2):
 splice: fix direct splice error handling
 Fix race with shared tag queue maps


Looks like there were some issues with splice that has been fixed in
2.6.22.9 kernel.

I am not sure how critical is that problem . Can I still use the
2.6.21/2.6.22 kernel for splice without any major issues ?
If not, which kernel version would give me a stable splice() .

Please note that I am not subscribed to this list , so please CC me (a
reply-all would do) in your reply.


Thanks in advance.

-Saswat
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ