[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474CA1F0.3090504@o2.pl>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:02:08 +0100
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] make I/O schedulers non-modular
Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 11/27/2007 11:15 PM:
...
> Otherwise it's not so hard to overlook some stagnation.
Btw., after this 'forking' thing etc. it seems I might have lost the point
a little: which removed choices should justify such a fork. But, I hope,
you didn't mean your patch only, because then e.g. this stagnation threat
looks like a bit exaggerated...
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists