linux-kernel - Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack wraparound occurs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071127230758.8099526F8E7@magilla.localdomain>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:07:58 -0800 (PST)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fw: Re: [PATCH 1/3] signal(i386): alternative signal stack
	wraparound occurs

> thanks Roland for the detailed analysis. I've queued up the patch below 
> in the x86 tree. I suspect we can wait with this for v2.6.25, due to 
> this being long-standing behavior of Linux? Thus we could observe the 
> effects of this patch for a longer time.

It's certainly nothing new.  The failure mode of concern is only for a
buggy program to fail to crash as quickly and gracefully as it might.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/