linux-kernel - [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory controller take 3 [0/10] introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071127115525.e9779108.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 11:55:25 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"yamamoto@...inux.co.jp" <yamamoto@...inux.co.jp>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"containers@...ts.osdl.org" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com" <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH][for -mm] per-zone and reclaim enhancements for memory
 controller take 3 [0/10] introduction

Hi, this is per-zone/reclaim support patch set for memory controller (cgroup).

Major changes from previous one is
 -- tested with 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 + ia64/NUMA
 -- applied comments.

I did small test on real NUMA machine.
My machine was ia64/8CPU/2Node NUMA. I tried to complile the kernel under 800M
bytes limit with 32 parallel make. (make -j 32)

 - 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 (+ scsi fix) .... shows soft lock-up.
   before soft lock-up, %sys was almost 100% in several times.

 - 2.6.24-rc3-mm1 (+ scsi fix) + this set .... completed succesfully
   It seems %iowait dominates the total performance.
   (current memory controller has no background reclaim)

Seems this set give us some progress.

(*) I'd like to merge YAMAMOTO-san's background page reclaim for memory
    controller before discussing about the number of performance.

Andrew, could you pick these up to -mm ?

Patch series brief description:

[1/10] ... add scan_global_lru() macro  (clean up)
[2/10] ... nid/zid helper function for cgroup
[3/10] ... introduce per-zone object for memory controller and add
           active/inactive counter.
[4/10] ... calculate mapper_ratio per cgroup (for memory reclaim)
[5/10] ... calculate active/inactive imbalance per cgroup (based on [3])
[6/10] ... remember reclaim priority in memory controller
[7/10] ... calculate the number of pages to be reclaimed per cgroup

[8/10] ... modifies vmscan.c to isolate global-lru-reclaim and
           memory-cgroup-reclaim in obvious manner.
           (this patch uses functions defined in [4 - 7])
[9/10] ... implement per-zone-lru for cgroup (based on [3])
[10/10] ... implement per-zone lru lock for cgroup (based on [3][9])

Any comments are welcome.

Thanks,
-Kame
 



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/