[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jer6ia3bz2.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:23:29 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...e.de>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Linux/m68k" <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: m68k build failure
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
>> Delightful. So what are the options here? Start packing the device table structs is the obvious quick fix. Declaring cross-compilation unsupported isn't really viable, and I guess determining padding differences is far from easy.
>
> There are some ugly options:
>
> Cross compile a test object containing nothing but
>
> struct whatever fred;
>
> then dump it with the relevant cross nm
Everything would be much easier if all those driver_data members of the
device table structs would not be there.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@...e.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists