[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071128125544.3a1ac7dd@the-village.bc.nu>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:55:44 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Kawai@...ricas.sgi.com,
Hidehiro <hidehiro.kawai.ez@...achi.com>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Bron Nelson <bron@....com>, Stephen Champion <schamp@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can we make application core dumps interruptible?
> They hoped for a couple changes, one of which is a way for a SIGTERM,
> SIGKILL, or something along that line interrupting the core dump process.
> Is this the correct direction to take? Are there any better ideas for
> handling this?
Probably. In addition current kernels allow you to pipe the core dump via
a userspace helper instead of direct to disk. That may possibly be
helpful ?
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists