linux-kernel - Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:24:57 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
CC:	jdike@...toit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: -rt doesn't compile for UML

> > >   CC      kernel/latency_trace.o
> > > kernel/latency_trace.c:28:21: error: asm/rtc.h: No such file or directory
> > > kernel/latency_trace.c:63:3: error: #error Implement cycles_to_usecs.
> > > kernel/latency_trace.c: In function ???____trace???:
> > > kernel/latency_trace.c:658: error: implicit declaration of function ???irqs_disabled_flags???
> > > make[1]: *** [kernel/latency_trace.o] Error 1
> > 
> > hm, just fill those functions in - should be fairly trivial and we can 
> > carry those patches in -rt. (I'd suggest to create an empty 
> > asm-um/rtc.h stub as well, for consistency.)
> 
> trivial == 'far easier than porting -rt to UML' :-)

OK :)

If I get stuck, I'll leave it to Jeff...

Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/