linux-kernel - [Patch 0/2] Kernel: mutex_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <68d904ba0711280552i4ee6637j47c7ee2f72a77661@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:52:33 -0500
From:	"Liam Howlett" <howlett@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	willy@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: [Patch 0/2] Kernel: mutex_lock_killable

Hello,

This series of patches add the ability to make mutex locks killable
instead of uninterruptable.

This patch set builds on willys 5 patches for TASK_KILLABLE that are
currently in mm (see http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/18/423 for more
details).  I have used 2.6.24-rc3 with the addition of willys patches.

The first patch adds the mutex_lock_killable to the kernel/mutex.c and
kernel/mutex.h.

The second patch is a use of the mutex_lock_killable to fs/readdir.c
to use the new mutex_lock_killable.  This was enough for a small test
application to be killable once the ethernet was pulled on an nfs
mount (please note that this does not allow a normal ls to be killed
yet).

akpm: can you take these for merge in 2.6.25?

A big thanks to Matthew for all the help on these patches.
Please CC me on any responses.

Thanks,
Liam R. Howlett
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/