[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474D8FD2.4010009@imap.cc>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:57:06 +0100
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To: Dave Quigley <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>
CC: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: git guidance
Dave Quigley schrieb:
> There is a project listed on the kernel.org git page called guilt. I
> find it very useful. It is much more responsive than stgit and it
> actually has a git backend which quilt does not.
>
> On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 00:20 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> On Nov 27 2007 23:33, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
>> >
>> >Well, it did. So now I'm back to keeping a virgin kernel source tree
>> >alongside my development area in order to produce diffs. That can't
>> >be right?
>> >
>> No, it can't. Use stgit/quilt ;p
In which respect would stgit/quilt/guilt help me? At first glance
they just seem to add another level of complexity.
Thanks,
Tilman
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Yes, I have searched Google!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (251 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists