linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] New kobject/kset/ktype documentation and example code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1196265787.3242.65.camel@lov.site>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:03:07 +0100
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New kobject/kset/ktype documentation and example code

On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:52 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:35:54 +0100,
> Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 10:01 +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:02:52 -0800, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > > Among other things, kobject_init() sets the kobject's reference count to
> > > > one.  Calling kobject_init() is not sufficient, however. Kobject users
> > > > must, at a minimum, set the name of the kobject; this is the name that will
> > > > be used in sysfs entries. 
> > > 
> > > Unless they don't register their kobject. (But they should always set a
> > > name anyway to avoid funny debug messages, so it is probably a good
> > > idea to call this a "must").
> > 
> > Yeah, we should require it. And kobject_cleanup() needs to be called to
> > free the allocated name, if the object is not already added and needs to
> > be deleted (common in rewinding on error).
> 
> Always using kobject_put() should take care of that.

Ok, so we can always require a kobject_put() after a kobject_init(), to
cleanup what happened after _init() and before _add()?

> > Btw, do you have a good example for unregistered/unnamed kobjects?
> 
> Unfortunately not (I can only think of devices that might never be
> registered).

This is good, we should just get rid of that use case, it seems it
doesn't make any sense to use kobjects which will never be registered.

Thanks,
Kay

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/