[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711281831.27379.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:31:27 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.
On Wednesday 28 November 2007 17:48:17 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:00:22PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >...
> > > of a modular ipv6 is flawed.
> >
> > Modules that cannot be unloaded are still useful. Standard case: Distributions
> > like to offer an option to not use ipv6 because that is popular workaround
> > for the common "DNS server eats AAAA queries and causes delays" issue.
> > Forcing the user to rebuild the kernel for this wouldn't be practical.
> > If ipv6 wasn't modular that would be hard to do.
>
> It should be trivial doing it similar to the selinux=0 boot option.
They safe also a few hundred KB of memory this way.
I know it is not en vogue anymore to care about memory bloat, but
I personally like that.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists