linux-kernel - Re: Out of tree module using LSM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071128183040.GW8181@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:30:40 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
	"Tvrtko A. Ursulin" <tvrtko.ursulin@...hos.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Out of tree module using LSM

On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 01:15:05PM -0500, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> (Note that the concept has interesting implications in the other direction as
> well - rather than stopping you from reading a file that has malware, you could
> in theory write an anti-export package that would let you write onto external
> memory or outbound e-mail, but prevent the write if it was corporate-sensitive
> data, or whatever.

You _can_ _not_ do that.  If shared mapping gets dirtied, you have no way to
intercept that.  At all.  Especially since the page stays mapped while it is
written out, so the next modification can come when hardware had already
started outbound DMA and there's no way to abort it, no matter what your
external scanner would do.

Folks, really, that doesn't work.  At all.  You can intercept all system
calls you want and it will not be enough to prevent the "bad" contents
from hitting the disk.

And if we are talking about the situation when files are written to in
controlled way (i.e. we are not concerned with malware running on the box
in question and just want to stop it from passing through mailsewer, etc.),
then there's no damn need to play with LSM - just have e.g. coda with its
commit-on-close and run the scanner on commit.  End of story.  Mind you,
in such setups one would be much better off just having the mail server run
the tests explicitly in the userland, along with the rest of anti-spam, etc.
filters.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/